8/19/05

Editorials from The Roanoke Times -Victory Stadium as directional signal

One has to wonder how many editorials the Times has written like this over the past years.

"Aunt Mabel used to come a'visitin' every Thanksgiving, and greet us as we came through the door after the big game with the smell of her pecan pie."

Boy, what a high opinion they have of their readership.

And might I mention the dripping irony this op/ed has? Sad, really. It is the very definition of "a good talking-down to."

Oh yes, and by the by - take a look at Florida. U of Miami Hurricanes vs. FSU Seminoles vs. U of Florida Gators. 3 big teams, 3 huge rivalrys. So I guess a college football rivalry is still a major event in someones life.

Me thinks the Times needs to realize for as much griping about how people "want Roanoke back the way it used to be," they too are secretly hoping for things back the way it used to be - when their circulation was high, readership was widespread, and while you would always have your Bill McClure's, the majority of people generally agreed with them.

Ahh the halcyon days of journalisim. When people rarely questioned the validity of a newspapers opinions.

Editorial board of the Times: I am fairly certain most people allready have an opinion on Victory Stadium, be it white-water rafting area when it floods, or landfill when its torn down. Write the article explaining both sides, do not opine and condescend to tell us what we should think.

"The pitched political battle over the stadium reflects two very different visions of what the city and its place in the region should be: competitive, insular, wedded to the past; or collaborative, open, ready for change. And change will happen, guaranteed."

Umm.. yeah, ok. If thats what you believe. Or it could be that the vision that you term competitive, insular, and wedded to the past might be competitive with, say... Greensboro for concerts and whatnot. Insular in that we are not recieving funding for the rebuild from Salem or any other local municipality. And wedded to the past could be mistaken for actually appreciating the past, and what it can bring forth to the future.

Times, I have a feeling your clock is nearing midnight.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

"Write the article explaining both sides, do not opine and condescend to tell us what we should think"

It's not an article, it's an editorial. They're supposed to opine, heck even bloviate, to coin O'Reilly's phrase.